"okay you pathetic halfwits, listen up and listen GOOD. i missed a fucking week of updating. why? because i dont give a shit about this page and i certainly dont give a goddamn shit about you braindead jackasses reading my fucking web-site." – cliff yablonski hates you (via pixelix).

a weblog totally dedicated to a delicate topic: "radio im netz".

i miss the punk attitude on elke "ella propella" hering's website... or is she doing the queer things here? <g>

uh, no, i just did not click on the right spots: there are them monsters and underground babies.

ok, and who's inside this poofy suit?

probably a big difference between weblogging and the myth of professional journalism is that stalwarts of the latter build much too many words around a simple link...

from vienna via prague viamichelin to berlin: 625km, 7h30.

yes, stapler indeed is an interesting tool for radio userland that creates rss feeds from simple html web sites of my choice. but it lacks usability, messes with style sheets (especially scrollbars) and i don't understand how to set it up for scanning some pages. with all the experience of quirks and inconsistency in radio userland itself i definitely will beware of using a plug-in even tipsier than its socket. alas.

r@dio.mp3 broadcasts digital music via satellite without any fees or many restrictions. one simply needs a computer with tv-card installed and a cable tv connection. surprisingly, internet access is not even necessary.

although the @ in the name misgives a lot, the technical concept behind the idea seems to be quite smart: radio.mp3 utilizes a gap in tv transmission, the so-called "tv vertical blanking interval", to send encoded mp3 data to the connected machines. since radio.mp3 owns a broadcasting license, they do not seem to interfere with current copyright law. it will be interesting to watch what the anti-napster faction is going to do about that.

further reading: c't article, teletext transmission details, video technology page at epanorama.

i don't know how sofist stefan knecht defines "successful content syndication". however, i know at least four entities that do content syndication and are not publishers [1, 2, 3, 4]. in my eyes they are successful. because they do it right. but i do not have a clue if they make enough or any money at all with it...

online journalism review, "blogged down in the pr machine": "many journalist-run blogs have small but dedicated followings of opinion leaders and influencers, the key people that pr companies are trying to target. in their niche-geared, serendipitous way, blogs reach a significant proportion of the web's mindshare. in so doing, they may exert an influence rivaling that of traditional news outlets.'"

elearningpost: grassroots knowledge management through blogging.